December 31, 2020 By Seth D. Jaffe
Categories: Air , Climate Change , Sustainability , Green Design , Renewable Energy , Regulation , Infrastructure , GHG , Nuclear Power , Environmental Justice , Adaptation , Energy , Clean Energy , Energy Policy , Hydropower , New England , Regional Energy Infrastructure , Climate Response , Transportation , Wind
Yesterday, Massachusetts released its “2050 Decarbonization Roadmap.” I'm tempted to call it a tour de force. At the very least, it's jam-packed with important issues. One of the most valuable aspects of the Roadmap is its discussion of the potential tradeoffs among the different paths towards a decarbonized economy. Acknowledging that the Roadmap contains much more good stuff than can be summarized in a single post, I'm going to focus in this post on some of the key choices that are going to have to be made among the various options discussed.
Here goes:
If I have one criticism of the Roadmap, this last bullet crystallizes it. The Roadmap is encouraging in that it notes that getting to a decarbonized economy does not require some miracle new technology that remains to be discovered. It does give rather short shrift to the miracle new politics that we're going to need to make these pathways a reality. I understand that the politics of how we get this done was not the focus of the Roadmap; it is, however, going to have to be the focus of a lot of people working very hard over the next 30 years.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. And the length of the journey cannot discourage us from starting.